Hmm, I guess I was wrong, sorry for the misleading statement.
When you hook up two identical amps side by side, the sound waves sum coherently on axis, so the SPL rating at 1 meter on axis goes up by 6dB, not 3, even though the electrical input power only went up by 3dB.
So it's as if the sensitivity of each speaker increased by 3dB: the efficiency gain mentioned earlier.
I suppose the reason is that two speakers side-by-side have more directivity than a single one. More sound gets beamed straight down the middle. However, there are just as many places where the waves from the two speakers interfere destructively, so maybe if you integrate the sound power over a full sphere round the speakers, you'll find that it only went up by 3dB, as conservation of energy demands.
I guess the logical conclusion of this line of thought is the line array, which harnesses constructive interference to put most of the sound where you want it, and hardly any of it where you don't.
When you hook up two identical amps side by side, the sound waves sum coherently on axis, so the SPL rating at 1 meter on axis goes up by 6dB, not 3, even though the electrical input power only went up by 3dB.
So it's as if the sensitivity of each speaker increased by 3dB: the efficiency gain mentioned earlier.
I suppose the reason is that two speakers side-by-side have more directivity than a single one. More sound gets beamed straight down the middle. However, there are just as many places where the waves from the two speakers interfere destructively, so maybe if you integrate the sound power over a full sphere round the speakers, you'll find that it only went up by 3dB, as conservation of energy demands.
I guess the logical conclusion of this line of thought is the line array, which harnesses constructive interference to put most of the sound where you want it, and hardly any of it where you don't.
Comment